Skip to main content

Non Aligned Movement (NAM)

Introduction 

The word non aligned means being "non aligned with the great power blocs of the world for distancing oneself from rivalry between the two camps".
But it did not mean being passive neutrals. We judged each issue on its merit and did not toe the line of one or the other
superpower. 
Growth of NAM

The pioneers of non aligned movement were:
1. Jawaharlal Nehru, prime minister of India
2. Gamal Abdul Nasir, President of Egypt
3. Sukarno, President of Indonesia
4. Joseph broz Tito, marshal of Yugoslavia
5. Kwame Nkrumah, prime minister of Ghana

President sukarno hosted a conference of 29 Asian and African countries at Bandung.
It marked the birth of new Asia and Africa.
The first summit of NAM nations was held at Belgrade in 1961.
It was attended by 25 non-aligned Nations.
The 16th summit was held at Tehran (Iran) in 2012. It was attended by heads of state or government of 118 Nations.
How India distanced herself from two camps??

India was careful to keep her distance from the two military alliances ( NATO and Warsaw Pact) and two power blocs.
In 1950 India strongly condemned North Korean aggression against South Korea.
In 1956 India condemned the Anglo French action in Egypt on the Suez canal issue.
But in same year Hungary under Imre Nagy, a staunch nationalist withdrew from the Warsaw pact. Soviet union invaded Hungary and installed a pro-russian government there.
India's comment on this event was in low key manner we were not loud in our condemnation of the Soviet aggression.
Therefore, India's policy of non alignment was criticized for being 'inconsistent' and 'unprincipled'.
Despite such exceptions by and large India judged each international issue on its merits and get economic assistant from both the power blocs.

Basic principle of India's foreign policy: 

1. Non alignment as the means of promoting peace and progress all over the world.
2. Opposition to colonialism, imperialism and racism.
3. Peaceful coexistence
4. Being firm in our resolve not to initiate a nuclear war
5. Respect for human rights
6. Support to the UN actions
7. Stress on the need of a new international economic order.
India was also a signatory member of United Nations and actively participated in its campaigns. India is a peace loving country.

Relevance of NAM

 1. The spirit of the non-aligned movement is that the poor and the small countries of the world should not lose their sense of Identity.
 2. The core issues like colonialism or more correctly neo-colonialism disarmament democracy and human rights are as relevant today as ever.
 3. With the relaxation of cold war the name leaders did rightly shift their emphasis from political to economic matters. They stressed the importance of a new international economic order.
 4. The name has now seriously taken the question of reshaping the UN security council in order to make it more democratic and more representative body.


What's your views about the relevance of NAM comment in the comment section.



Labels:

Comments

  1. CrouseJune 5, 2021 at 7:59 PM

    Thanks for the information. I was not aware of how recently this understanding of the Non-Aligned Movement formally met. Has there been any more recently activity since 2012?

    9:27 to 9:29 am CST
    June 5, 2021

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Do films create a social evil?

  firstly, we should know about the social evils. Social evils :  Social evils are all the elements that are contradictory to moral values.  These affect not just individuals but the whole society member, which are related to each other in terms of nation or a community. Some of the social evils are ; Youth crime, drugs, and alcohol abuse, falling values, etc. Now let's get back to the question Do films create a social evil? ​Yes, some films cause social evil but second thing is that the audience should also need to understand which kinds of films to be watched. ​ Let's take a review;     We watch movies and we enjoy but we forgot this one silver screen is for our entertainment but real life is different.     In movies everything is possible but in real life maybe it is not possible.  But movie's impact is always shown in our society.    Especially, teenagers want to fulfill their dreams and desires and they can not understand what is wrong and what is right only they want
3 comments
Read more

voting rights to illiterate-logical or not??

India's literacy rate is 74.4% according to the 2011 census, which contains 82.14% for males and 65.46% for females. Any Indian citizen who is 18yrs old and above has the right to vote and contest the election.13 Dec 1989 was the date when the starting age was reduced to18yrs from 21yrs. There is a constitutional body in India that handles the whole election procedure from the election of Prime Minister to Sarpanch. When India became independent thousands of questions arose in the minds of constitution-makers. One major question among all these was- Should illiterate people have the right to vote? We know that voting is a very big responsibility in a democracy. After a lot of debates and arguments, the decision was taken and voting right was also given to illiterate citizens. Arguments in favor  1. By not providing them the right to vote, we are violating their right to equality. 2. An illiterate voter can distinguish between genuine promises and false promises.  3. Som
12 comments
Read more

Rihanna tweet on farmers protest

Introduction : One tweet has shaken the government of India, forced the external affairs ministry to take a stand. One tweet has provided headlines to every news channel. One tweet has wakened our sleeping celebrities . I am talking about the tweet done by Rihanna (singer). Who is Rihanna? Rihanna is a world-famous singer, has over 100 million followers on Twitter . When she tweeted on the farmer's protest, thousand of people retweeted, some in against and some in favor. Many international personalities such as Greta Thunberg, MP's of Canada, and the UK tweeted for farmers. National personalities like Sachin Tendulkar, Akshay Kumar, Ajay Devgan, etc also tweeted after Rihanna's tweet. Are these celebrities aware of farm bills? They are neither against nor favor the farm bills but just speaking about human rights and the right to protest.  Now the question has changed? Now the question is not about if you support farm bills or not? Now
8 comments
Read more