Skip to main content

Are we all walking towards the wrong destination?



Nowadays, some individuals proclaim that due to the rapid development of science and technology, most people in the world have become much more articulate than human beings from less active periods of history.

 According to them by a substantial increase of world knowledge, human awareness of the most modern dangerous issues is constantly growing, which is a phenomenon that takes an ever greater harvest due to the enormous power of the media and the general dissemination of newly discovered information among units without specialist knowledge.
 
 However, many eminent thinkers are categorically opposed to such views, saying that the tremendous pace currently imposed by science far outstrips the wisdom of society, which, through rapid change, is utterly helpless. 
 
Hence, humanity as a community acquires information completely unevenly, which creates a significant leap between people familiar with modern discoveries of science and units who adhere to the paradigms of the early twentieth century. 

So is science gathering information faster than society's wisdom? Or maybe they develop evenly?

Although a great deal of environment keeps their "wisdom" up-to-date by stating information gained by science as a clear priority, most units (including the most intelligent of us) are unable to acquire this amount of information, and thus everyone is left behind in some way. 

Group wisdom develops slowly as it evolves, making any violent discovery a real shock to all public opinion, not to mention the fact that such groundbreaking events have been happening continuously for at least 60 years. 

Humanity is charging forward and significant differences in the acquisition of knowledge are already a huge problem that divides humanity at an alarming rate, unfortunately leading to many unresolved misunderstandings, despite e prevalent intensification of education around the world.

- AD Chaudhary.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do films create a social evil?

  firstly, we should know about the social evils. Social evils :  Social evils are all the elements that are contradictory to moral values.  These affect not just individuals but the whole society member, which are related to each other in terms of nation or a community. Some of the social evils are ; Youth crime, drugs, and alcohol abuse, falling values, etc. Now let's get back to the question Do films create a social evil? ​Yes, some films cause social evil but second thing is that the audience should also need to understand which kinds of films to be watched. ​ Let's take a review;     We watch movies and we enjoy but we forgot this one silver screen is for our entertainment but real life is different.     In movies everything is possible but in real life maybe it is not possible.  But movie's impact is always shown in our society.    Especially, teenagers want to fulfill their dreams and desires and they can not understand what is wrong and what is right only they want

voting rights to illiterate-logical or not??

India's literacy rate is 74.4% according to the 2011 census, which contains 82.14% for males and 65.46% for females. Any Indian citizen who is 18yrs old and above has the right to vote and contest the election.13 Dec 1989 was the date when the starting age was reduced to18yrs from 21yrs. There is a constitutional body in India that handles the whole election procedure from the election of Prime Minister to Sarpanch. When India became independent thousands of questions arose in the minds of constitution-makers. One major question among all these was- Should illiterate people have the right to vote? We know that voting is a very big responsibility in a democracy. After a lot of debates and arguments, the decision was taken and voting right was also given to illiterate citizens. Arguments in favor  1. By not providing them the right to vote, we are violating their right to equality. 2. An illiterate voter can distinguish between genuine promises and false promises.  3. Som

Rihanna tweet on farmers protest

Introduction : One tweet has shaken the government of India, forced the external affairs ministry to take a stand. One tweet has provided headlines to every news channel. One tweet has wakened our sleeping celebrities . I am talking about the tweet done by Rihanna (singer). Who is Rihanna? Rihanna is a world-famous singer, has over 100 million followers on Twitter . When she tweeted on the farmer's protest, thousand of people retweeted, some in against and some in favor. Many international personalities such as Greta Thunberg, MP's of Canada, and the UK tweeted for farmers. National personalities like Sachin Tendulkar, Akshay Kumar, Ajay Devgan, etc also tweeted after Rihanna's tweet. Are these celebrities aware of farm bills? They are neither against nor favor the farm bills but just speaking about human rights and the right to protest.  Now the question has changed? Now the question is not about if you support farm bills or not? Now