Skip to main content

Dowry system in India is curtailed only in law not practically...

 Dowry system is one of the highly prevalent societal issue of India which once started as a custom has now turned into a evil culture.


Dowry refers to the payment made in cash or kind (valuable goods like furniture, jewellery etc) to a bride’s in-laws at the time of her marriage. 

The amount depends on a large number of factors, including region, religion, caste and subcaste, groom’s education, bride’s skin tone and the negotiation skills of both the families involved.



 The bride’s family gives these gifts for the well being of their daughter in her in-laws house and also to give her some financial security.


But now, this commonly and widely practiced culture of South Asian, African and European countries has brought major problems to society.


 This practice can be linked to the patriarchal issues like dependency of woman on her husband, gender inequality, foeticide cases etc.


Not everyone has ability to give dowry to their daughter.


 Its one of the primary reason that poor families thinks a girl as a burden to them. 

 

They find themselves as incapable to give dowry thus leading to female infanticide cases in many parts of India.


 They sacrifice their entire earnings and family property just to ensure a stable and fulfilling marriage of their daughter.

 

 Rather than sending the daughters to school they tend to save money for their marriages.


But greed has no end. We are well aware of the news of killing or burning of brides by their in-laws or husband for more dowry.


 Our daily newspapers are filled with the dowry death or domestic harassment cases. 

 

Even if somehow a bride is able to give dowry then family pressurize her for not giving enough dowry and start demanding more. 


Therefore to restrain such atrocious incidents, government of India had passed some laws.


 It includes ‘The Dowry Prohibition Act of 1961’ and ‘Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act of 2005’.

 

 According to the law, giving or receiving of dowry is prohibited and anyone who gives or takes dowry will be punished with imprisonment of not less than five years and a fine of around fifteen thousand rupees.

 

 But these anti dowry laws are ineffective due to their weak implementation, wide practice of this vice and lack of education among downtrodden sections of India. 


Dowry system has been curtailed in laws but the real image of society shows it other way. 


The National Crime Record Bureau of India reports that every hour a woman succumbs to dowry deaths.

On an average, more than 20 women are killed everyday for dowry. 

Even with increasing awareness among youth, this bane culture is not showing abating signs. 


The actual picture is more worse than what is being reported. Many of such cases are obscured by the bride’s family for their family prestige and honour.



It is deplorable that such traditions are still carried in India at a wide level despite the awareness, education and governmental laws. 


Thus it’s the need of the hour that these laws should be practically curtailed and not just in Constitution so that every married woman can live a happy and honoured life.


Prachi Tamak.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Do films create a social evil?

  firstly, we should know about the social evils. Social evils :  Social evils are all the elements that are contradictory to moral values.  These affect not just individuals but the whole society member, which are related to each other in terms of nation or a community. Some of the social evils are ; Youth crime, drugs, and alcohol abuse, falling values, etc. Now let's get back to the question Do films create a social evil? ​Yes, some films cause social evil but second thing is that the audience should also need to understand which kinds of films to be watched. ​ Let's take a review;     We watch movies and we enjoy but we forgot this one silver screen is for our entertainment but real life is different.     In movies everything is possible but in real life maybe it is not possible.  But movie's impact is always shown in our society.    Especially, teenagers want to fulfill their dreams and desires and they can not understand what is wrong and what is right only they want

voting rights to illiterate-logical or not??

India's literacy rate is 74.4% according to the 2011 census, which contains 82.14% for males and 65.46% for females. Any Indian citizen who is 18yrs old and above has the right to vote and contest the election.13 Dec 1989 was the date when the starting age was reduced to18yrs from 21yrs. There is a constitutional body in India that handles the whole election procedure from the election of Prime Minister to Sarpanch. When India became independent thousands of questions arose in the minds of constitution-makers. One major question among all these was- Should illiterate people have the right to vote? We know that voting is a very big responsibility in a democracy. After a lot of debates and arguments, the decision was taken and voting right was also given to illiterate citizens. Arguments in favor  1. By not providing them the right to vote, we are violating their right to equality. 2. An illiterate voter can distinguish between genuine promises and false promises.  3. Som

Rihanna tweet on farmers protest

Introduction : One tweet has shaken the government of India, forced the external affairs ministry to take a stand. One tweet has provided headlines to every news channel. One tweet has wakened our sleeping celebrities . I am talking about the tweet done by Rihanna (singer). Who is Rihanna? Rihanna is a world-famous singer, has over 100 million followers on Twitter . When she tweeted on the farmer's protest, thousand of people retweeted, some in against and some in favor. Many international personalities such as Greta Thunberg, MP's of Canada, and the UK tweeted for farmers. National personalities like Sachin Tendulkar, Akshay Kumar, Ajay Devgan, etc also tweeted after Rihanna's tweet. Are these celebrities aware of farm bills? They are neither against nor favor the farm bills but just speaking about human rights and the right to protest.  Now the question has changed? Now the question is not about if you support farm bills or not? Now