indian secularism.

I have lived almost 18 years in this country. Almost everyday I was reminded that how great this country is, how we gained our independence, how old and precious is our history and how we live in unity even after being so diverse.

We have many different cultures, languages and religions but we still stand as a single nation.

All these same lines we have heard of years and years. And it seems there is no loop hole in this scenario because no one have the dare to say that above all religion and cultures there stands a single dictator

" HINDUISM".

There are always some factors which lead to rise of a dictator and biggest factor behind this dictator of Hinduism is Indian politics.

Politicians since independence had used the religion to manipulate people. Hindus being in majority were the biggest target so since independence politicians have controlled our governing system by manipulating Hindus.

For example our most famous Hindu serial RAMAYAN started by our government in 1987.

1987 there was Congress government in centre lead by Rajiv Gandhi. At that time Congress was facing use allegation on Bofors deal. Starting of Ramayana at that time indicates towards two loopholes in our system.

1. How government used religion to manipulate us at that time. The allegation on PM were very promising and whole country was protesting against it whole media was on this scam. People were protesting against it and due to all this Congress dominance was fading. To restore that dominance and distract people from this topic they use religion as a weapon and decided to start Ramayan on DD National. This is one of many examples.

2. Reality of secularism in India - it is clearly mentioned in our constitution and preamble that our country is secular. It is shocking to think that government of a secular country started a show based on ancient Hindu books.

Same things happens in my city 'kurukshetra' every year conducts a 10 days festival on holy book of Hindu's 'Bhagwat Geeta".

Recently supreme court gave decision on 'Ram Mandir's case went on the favour of hindu maha sabha. Being a secular country we could have made a decision good for everyone such as we could have opened a school in that place where children of every religion could have studied together.

Let us see indian secularism with another view. Our current ruling party BJP have direct relations with an organisation called RSS which is officially a hindu organization. BJP uses religion as their main election campaign. Most of the BJP workers and ministers openly spread hate for other religions.

Till now we don't have any explanation for Gujarat riots against muslim.

And still BJP says that they are a secular party.

Nishant vats

(Unbiased hindu)

-guest writer-

What's your views on this.

Please tell us in the comment section.

Do films create a social evil?

firstly, we should know about the social evils. Social evils : Social evils are all the elements that are contradictory to moral values. These affect not just individuals but the whole society member, which are related to each other in terms of nation or a community. Some of the social evils are ; Youth crime, drugs, and alcohol abuse, falling values, etc. Now let's get back to the question Do films create a social evil? Yes, some films cause social evil but second thing is that the audience should also need to understand which kinds of films to be watched. Let's take a review; We watch movies and we enjoy but we forgot this one silver screen is for our entertainment but real life is different. In movies everything is possible but in real life maybe it is not possible. But movie's impact is always shown in our society. Especially, teenagers want to fulfill their dreams and desires and they can not understand what is wrong and what is right only they want

voting rights to illiterate-logical or not??

India's literacy rate is 74.4% according to the 2011 census, which contains 82.14% for males and 65.46% for females. Any Indian citizen who is 18yrs old and above has the right to vote and contest the election.13 Dec 1989 was the date when the starting age was reduced to18yrs from 21yrs. There is a constitutional body in India that handles the whole election procedure from the election of Prime Minister to Sarpanch. When India became independent thousands of questions arose in the minds of constitution-makers. One major question among all these was- Should illiterate people have the right to vote? We know that voting is a very big responsibility in a democracy. After a lot of debates and arguments, the decision was taken and voting right was also given to illiterate citizens. Arguments in favor 1. By not providing them the right to vote, we are violating their right to equality. 2. An illiterate voter can distinguish between genuine promises and false promises. 3. Som

Rihanna tweet on farmers protest

Introduction : One tweet has shaken the government of India, forced the external affairs ministry to take a stand. One tweet has provided headlines to every news channel. One tweet has wakened our sleeping celebrities . I am talking about the tweet done by Rihanna (singer). Who is Rihanna? Rihanna is a world-famous singer, has over 100 million followers on Twitter . When she tweeted on the farmer's protest, thousand of people retweeted, some in against and some in favor. Many international personalities such as Greta Thunberg, MP's of Canada, and the UK tweeted for farmers. National personalities like Sachin Tendulkar, Akshay Kumar, Ajay Devgan, etc also tweeted after Rihanna's tweet. Are these celebrities aware of farm bills? They are neither against nor favor the farm bills but just speaking about human rights and the right to protest. Now the question has changed? Now the question is not about if you support farm bills or not? Now

AnonymousMarch 31, 2021 at 9:33 PM
Indian secularism is partly true.
Prashant YadavApril 1, 2021 at 1:41 PM
Good going...great content keep it up...

Best wishes❣️
UnknownApril 1, 2021 at 2:22 PM
Good job👍🏻
Keep it up
AnonymousMay 7, 2021 at 10:25 AM
Flawed definition of secularism used in the article.
1. Secularism doesn't mean non-hinduism. It means state won't subscribe to any religion.

We have HAJ-SUBSIDY based on taxpayers money. We have MADARSAS running on public money. We have crutches in north-east which are dependent partially on government funds.
Supreme court judgement was based on findings of ASI and not on majoritarianism.
Telecast of Ramayana in no way degrades the secular fabric of India .
The writer is a "biased" man not an unbiased hindu.
Get your idea of secularism straight.

Social issues

Search This Blog